For Christmas I got an interesting gift from a good friend - my extremely own "best-selling" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (excellent title) bears my name and my picture on its cover, and it has radiant reviews.

Yet it was totally written by AI, with a couple of basic prompts about me provided by my good friend Janet.

It's an interesting read, and uproarious in parts. But it likewise meanders quite a lot, and is somewhere in between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It simulates my chatty design of writing, but it's likewise a bit repetitive, and extremely verbose. It may have gone beyond Janet's prompts in collating information about me.

Several sentences begin "as a leading innovation journalist ..." - cringe - which might have been scraped from an online bio.

There's also a mystical, repetitive hallucination in the form of my cat (I have no family pets). And there's a metaphor on practically every page - some more random than others.

There are dozens of companies online offering AI-book composing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I got in touch with the president Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he informed me he had offered around 150,000 customised books, akropolistravel.com generally in the US, since rotating from assembling AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller expenses ₤ 26. The firm uses its own AI tools to create them, based upon an open source large language design.

I'm not asking you to purchase my book. Actually you can't - only Janet, who produced it, can purchase any further copies.

There is currently no barrier to anybody developing one in anybody's name, consisting of stars - although Mr Mashiach states there are guardrails around violent material. Each book consists of a printed disclaimer mentioning that it is fictional, created by AI, and designed "solely to bring humour and delight".

Legally, the copyright belongs to the firm, but Mr Mashiach stresses that the product is intended as a "customised gag present", and the books do not get sold even more.

He intends to expand his range, generating various categories such as sci-fi, and perhaps using an autobiography service. It's developed to be a light-hearted form of consumer AI - selling AI-generated goods to human consumers.

It's likewise a bit scary if, like me, forum.altaycoins.com you compose for a living. Not least due to the fact that it probably took less than a minute to generate, and it does, definitely in some parts, sound similar to me.

Musicians, authors, artists and actors worldwide have expressed alarm about their work being used to train generative AI tools that then churn out similar material based upon it.

"We should be clear, when we are speaking about information here, we in fact indicate human creators' life works," states Ed Newton Rex, founder of Fairly Trained, which campaigns for AI firms to regard developers' rights.

"This is books, this is posts, this is photos. It's artworks. It's records ... The entire point of AI training is to find out how to do something and after that do more like that."

In 2023 a tune including AI-generated voices of Canadian vocalists Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social networks before being pulled from streaming platforms since it was not their work and they had not consented to it. It didn't stop the track's developer attempting to choose it for a Grammy award. And despite the fact that the artists were fake, it was still hugely popular.

"I do not think making use of generative AI for creative functions need to be prohibited, however I do think that generative AI for these functions that is trained on people's work without permission need to be prohibited," Mr Newton Rex includes. "AI can be really effective however let's develop it fairly and fairly."

OpenAI says Chinese rivals utilizing its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes market and dents America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - consisting of the BBC - have picked to obstruct AI designers from trawling their online content for training functions. Others have chosen to team up - the Financial Times has partnered with ChatGPT creator OpenAI for instance.

The UK federal government is considering an overhaul of the law that would permit AI developers to utilize developers' content on the web to assist develop their models, unless the rights holders pull out.

Ed Newton Rex explains this as "insanity".

He points out that AI can make advances in locations like defence, healthcare and logistics without trawling the work of authors, reporters and artists.

"All of these things work without going and changing copyright law and destroying the livelihoods of the nation's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in the House of Lords, is likewise strongly versus removing copyright law for AI.

"Creative markets are wealth developers, 2.4 million tasks and an entire lot of delight," states the Baroness, who is also an advisor to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The federal government is weakening among its finest performing markets on the vague pledge of development."

A government representative stated: "No relocation will be made till we are absolutely confident we have a useful plan that provides each of our objectives: increased control for right holders to assist them certify their content, access to top quality product to train leading AI models in the UK, and more openness for best holders from AI developers."

Under the UK federal government's brand-new AI plan, a nationwide information library containing public information from a vast array of sources will likewise be offered to AI scientists.

In the US the future of federal rules to manage AI is now up in the air following President Trump's return to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that intended to boost the safety of AI with, to name a few things, firms in the sector needed to share details of the workings of their systems with the US federal government before they are launched.

But this has actually now been repealed by Trump. It stays to be seen what Trump will do rather, however he is said to want the AI sector to deal with less policy.

This comes as a variety of suits versus AI firms, and particularly versus OpenAI, continue in the US. They have actually been gotten by everyone from the New york city Times to authors, music labels, and even a comedian.

They declare that the AI firms broke the law when they took their content from the internet without their approval, and utilized it to train their systems.

The AI business argue that their actions fall under "reasonable usage" and are for that reason exempt. There are a number of aspects which can make up fair use - it's not a straight-forward meaning. But the AI sector is under increasing examination over how it collects training data and whether it should be paying for it.

If this wasn't all enough to consider, Chinese AI company DeepSeek has shaken the sector over the past week. It became one of the most free app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek declares that it developed its innovation for a portion of the cost of the similarity OpenAI. Its success has raised security issues in the US, and threatens American's present dominance of the sector.

As for me and a career as an author, bphomesteading.com I believe that at the minute, if I truly want a "bestseller" I'll still need to compose it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the existing weak point in generative AI tools for larger projects. It has lots of errors and hallucinations, and it can be rather hard to read in parts since it's so verbose.

But provided how quickly the tech is evolving, I'm unsure the length of time I can remain confident that my considerably slower human writing and editing abilities, are much better.

Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the greatest advancements in global innovation, with analysis from BBC reporters around the world.

Outside the UK? Register here.