For Christmas I got an interesting present from a good friend - my really own "best-selling" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (great title) bears my name and my image on its cover, and experienciacortazar.com.ar it has radiant reviews.

Yet it was totally composed by AI, with a couple of simple prompts about me supplied by my buddy Janet.

It's an intriguing read, and extremely funny in parts. But it likewise meanders quite a lot, and is somewhere between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It imitates my chatty design of writing, but it's likewise a bit recurring, and extremely verbose. It may have surpassed Janet's prompts in collecting data about me.

Several sentences start "as a leading innovation reporter ..." - cringe - which might have been scraped from an online bio.

There's likewise a strange, repetitive hallucination in the kind of my feline (I have no pets). And there's a metaphor on almost every page - some more random than others.

There are lots of companies online offering AI-book writing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I called the president Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he informed me he had actually offered around 150,000 personalised books, primarily in the US, since rotating from compiling AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller expenses ₤ 26. The company utilizes its own AI tools to generate them, based on an open source large language model.

I'm not asking you to buy my book. Actually you can't - only Janet, who developed it, can purchase any further copies.

There is currently no barrier to anyone creating one in anybody's name, consisting of celebrities - although Mr Mashiach says there are guardrails around abusive material. Each book includes a printed disclaimer specifying that it is imaginary, produced by AI, and created "solely to bring humour and pleasure".

Legally, the copyright belongs to the company, but Mr Mashiach worries that the item is meant as a "customised gag present", and the books do not get offered even more.

He intends to expand his variety, producing different categories such as sci-fi, and possibly providing an autobiography service. It's developed to be a light-hearted kind of consumer AI - selling AI-generated goods to human customers.

It's likewise a bit scary if, like me, you write for a living. Not least due to the fact that it most likely took less than a minute to produce, and it does, certainly in some parts, sound much like me.

Musicians, authors, artists and stars worldwide have expressed alarm about their work being utilized to train generative AI tools that then churn out comparable material based upon it.

"We need to be clear, when we are talking about information here, we in fact mean human developers' life works," states Ed Newton Rex, creator of Fairly Trained, which projects for AI firms to respect developers' rights.

"This is books, this is posts, this is pictures. It's works of art. It's records ... The whole point of AI training is to learn how to do something and then do more like that."

In 2023 a song featuring AI-generated voices of Canadian vocalists Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social media before being pulled from streaming platforms because it was not their work and they had not granted it. It didn't stop the track's developer trying to choose it for a Grammy award. And although the artists were phony, it was still hugely popular.

"I do not believe making use of generative AI for creative purposes ought to be prohibited, but I do believe that generative AI for these functions that is trained on individuals's work without authorization should be banned," Mr Newton Rex adds. "AI can be extremely powerful however let's develop it morally and fairly."

OpenAI says Chinese competitors utilizing its work for utahsyardsale.com their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes industry and damages America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - including the BBC - have actually picked to block AI designers from trawling their online material for training purposes. Others have decided to team up - the Financial Times has partnered with ChatGPT creator OpenAI for .

The UK government is considering an overhaul of the law that would permit AI developers to use developers' material on the internet to help establish their designs, unless the rights holders decide out.

Ed Newton Rex explains this as "madness".

He points out that AI can make advances in locations like defence, health care and logistics without trawling the work of authors, reporters and artists.

"All of these things work without going and changing copyright law and destroying the livelihoods of the country's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in your home of Lords, is also highly versus eliminating copyright law for AI.

"Creative markets are wealth developers, 2.4 million jobs and a great deal of happiness," states the Baroness, who is likewise a consultant to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The government is weakening among its finest carrying out markets on the vague promise of development."

A government spokesperson said: "No move will be made until we are definitely confident we have a useful plan that delivers each of our objectives: increased control for best holders to help them accredit their material, access to high-quality product to train leading AI designs in the UK, and more transparency for right holders from AI developers."

Under the UK government's brand-new AI strategy, a national information library including public information from a large range of sources will likewise be made available to AI researchers.

In the US the future of federal guidelines to control AI is now up in the air following President Trump's go back to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that intended to increase the safety of AI with, to name a few things, companies in the sector needed to share details of the operations of their systems with the US federal government before they are released.

But this has now been reversed by Trump. It remains to be seen what Trump will do instead, but he is stated to want the AI sector to deal with less regulation.

This comes as a variety of suits against AI firms, and especially versus OpenAI, continue in the US. They have actually been taken out by everyone from the New York Times to authors, music labels, and even a comic.

They claim that the AI firms broke the law when they took their material from the internet without their consent, and used it to train their systems.

The AI companies argue that their actions fall under "reasonable use" and are for that reason exempt. There are a variety of factors which can constitute reasonable use - it's not a straight-forward meaning. But the AI sector is under increasing analysis over how it gathers training information and whether it must be spending for it.

If this wasn't all enough to consider, Chinese AI company DeepSeek has shaken the sector over the previous week. It ended up being the most downloaded complimentary app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek declares that it developed its technology for a portion of the cost of the similarity OpenAI. Its success has raised security issues in the US, and threatens American's existing supremacy of the sector.

As for me and a career as an author, I think that at the moment, if I truly desire a "bestseller" I'll still need to write it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the current weakness in generative AI tools for bigger tasks. It has lots of mistakes and hallucinations, and it can be quite difficult to check out in parts since it's so long-winded.

But given how rapidly the tech is developing, I'm not sure how long I can remain positive that my significantly slower human writing and editing abilities, are much better.

Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the biggest developments in global innovation, photorum.eclat-mauve.fr with analysis from BBC correspondents around the globe.

Outside the UK? Sign up here.